Army Corps Yanks Appalachian Streamlined Surface
Mining Program
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced on June 17 that it will suspend the Nationwide Permit 21 program for coal mining operations in six Appalachian states, a move that will subject mining operations to lengthy permitting delays, threatening employment and energy supplies.
The Corps announced its intent to withdraw the permit program last year and held a series of public hearings to gauge public reaction to its proposed plan.
“The National Mining Association is deeply concerned that the Corps of Engineers has moved forward with its previously announced intention to suspend Nationwide Permit 21 for coal mining in Appalachia over the opposition of thousands of people who voiced their comments at public hearings earlier this year,” said NMA President and CEO Hal Quinn in a June 17 statement. “They were concerned about their jobs, their economic future and the energy security of the nation. NMA shares those concerns.”
Quinn emphasized that the nationwide permitting system, which applies to a wide range of economic activities, provides for a more efficient permitting process. “The current backlog of coal mining permits in Appalachia clearly demonstrates the consequences of eliminating this important regulatory tool,” he said.
“This decision will slow job creation, add further uncertainty to the permitting process and undermine our ability to utilize the nation’s most abundant domestic energy resource – coal,” Quinn said.
Senate Turns Back Murkowski Effort to Overturn EPA Plans for
Climate Regulations
The Senate this month voted down a resolution offered by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) that would have denied the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.
By a vote of 53-47, the Senate rejected Murkowski’s resolution, which sought to use the Congressional Review Act to overturn EPA’s plans for imposing a climate change program. Six Democrats sided with all 41 Republicans in support of the resolution.
Some Democrats reportedly opposed the resolution only after receiving assurances from Senate leaders that they will have an opportunity to vote for a bill offered by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) that would block EPA from issuing regulations governing stationery sources of carbon dioxide emissions for a two-year period. It is unclear, however, if Senate leaders actually made that commitment, or when a vote on Rockefeller’s bill might be held.
Rockefeller was among the group of six Democrats that voted in favor of Murkowski’s resolution.
Prior to the June 10 Senate vote, Murkowski reacted angrily to White House claims that her resolution would encourage further Gulf oil spills. “The only similarity I see between the oil spill and the EPA's climate regulations is that both are unmitigated disasters,” she said. “Trying to link this bipartisan measure to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill sets a new low.”
Following the Senate vote, U.S. Reps. Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.) and Rick Boucher (D-Va.) reiterated their strong support for the “Stationary Source Regulations Delay Act,” a companion measure to Sen. Rockefeller’s bill that they first introduced in March.
“Today’s defeat should not be the end of congressional efforts to rein in EPA,” they said in a joint statement. “The brakes need to be put on the EPA’s headlong rush to regulate carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants.” Rep. Shelly Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) agreed with Boucher and Rahall, saying that “although this vote failed, it is an important first step to letting EPA know that they cannot unilaterally set an agenda without the buy-in of the American people.”
Senate Democrats Cooling on John Kerry Push for Global
Warming Bill
Politico, a widely-read Capitol Hill publication, recently reported that on-going efforts by Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) to win support for a cap-and-trade climate bill are beginning to rub some of his fellow Democrats the wrong way.
The June 21 story reports Kerry’s zeal for pushing a climate bill “is making some swing-vote Democrats cringe at the thought of negotiating with someone they fear is tone-deaf to the political realities of their respective states – particularly in a difficult midterm elections year.”
The complete story is available at: Politico story.
Sen. Brown Asks President Obama to Drop Cap-and-Trade
Efforts to win approval of cap-and-trade legislation in the U.S. Senate were dealt a serious set-back this month when Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) told President Obama during a June 16 Oval Office meeting that he would not support a cap-and-trade or carbon fee plan.
Brown and Obama met a day after the president used a nationally televised address from the Oval Office to urge support for clean energy legislation. However, the president failed to make any reference to cap-and-trade programs in his speech.
Votes from moderate Republicans like Brown are seen as critical by climate change supporters working to find the 60 votes necessary to win Senate approval of a bill.
“He did talk about climate and his concerns about the climate and I basically told him that I’m not in favor, nor could I support, a national energy tax or a cap-and-trade proposal,” Brown told reporters after the June 16 meeting.
The Hill quoted Brown saying he would happily work with President Obama to pick the “low-hanging fruit” of energy reform.
“But I am very excited about working with him in a bipartisan manner to come up with a comprehensive energy plan to address a whole host of issues,” Brown said.
The complete story is available at: The Hill story.
Office of Surface Mining to Hold “Open Houses” on Proposed
New Stream Protection Measures
The Office of Surface Mining (OSM) announced this month that it will hold a series of “open houses” designed to solicit public feedback on the agency’s efforts to develop a “Stream Protection Rule” that would govern surface coal mining.
OSM said the open houses will begin in July, but the agency did not specify exact dates and locations, but did list the following cities as possible candidates: Morgantown, W.Va; Beckley, W.Va; Hazard, Ky.; Birmingham, Ala.; Evansville, Ind.; Carbondale, Ill.; Fairfield, Tex.; Farmington, N.M.; and Gillette, Wyo.
OSM is working to publish a proposed stream protection rule in early 2011, with a final rule due in mid-2012.
More information is available at: OSM open houses.
Sen. Murkowski Introduces Bill to Promote U.S. Production
of Rare Earth Minerals
Amid growing worries that the U.S. will soon face a shortage of rare earth minerals, Sen. Lisa Murkowski this month introduced legislation designed to boost domestic production of such minerals.
Rare earth minerals are used to produce cutting-edge technologies like laptops and cell phones, and are also widely used in military applications and needed to build solar panels and wind power platforms.
Murkowski is billing her “Rare Earth Supply Technology and Resources Transformation (RESART) Act” as an effort to help the United States regain its position as a leader in the mining and processing of rare earths elements.
“America’s growing reliance on foreign minerals endangers our efforts to advance cleaner energy,” Murkowski said in a June 22 statement. “We have slowly but surely surrendered the front end of the clean energy supply chain.”
Murkowski’s statement noted that America is estimated to hold 15 percent of the world’s rare earth reserves, but the nation remains dependent upon China for imports of nearly all of these critical materials.
“Rather than further restrict mining in this country, the industry could be creating American jobs and producing minerals that are essential to clean energy technologies. Unless action is taken, we will trade our current dependence on foreign oil for an equally unsettling dependence on foreign minerals,” Murkowski said.
Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colo.) introduced a companion measure (H.R. 4866) in March that has attracted bipartisan support in the U.S. House of Representatives.