Murkowski EPA Amendment to See Senate Action;
Graham Predicts Victory
A resolution that would overturn the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) plans to regulate greenhouse gas emissions using the Clean Air Act (CAA) is scheduled to come up for a Senate vote on June 10, according to co-sponsor Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R–Alaska). Murkowski told reporters that she and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D–Nev.) had reached an agreement that the measure, S.J. Res. 26, would come before the Senate under unanimous consent for 10 hours of debate, with no filibuster or amendments in order.
The resolution needs 51 supporters to pass the Senate. If the measure passes the Senate, it will go to the House for consideration. In addition to Murkowski, the bill is co-sponsored by Democratic Senators Blanche Lincoln (Ark.) and Ben Nelson (Neb.), along with all Senate Republicans, leaving Murkowski looking to wrangle eight votes from a group of moderate Democrats.
The resolution was given a public vote of confidence last week by co-sponsor Lindsey Graham (R–S.C.), who predicted that a “majority of the body will say that Congress should set the carbon regulations, not the EPA.”
Sen. Jay Rockefeller had introduced a bill with the support of seven fellow Senate Democrats that seeks to delay EPA’s plans for two years, but Rockefeller on May 25 expressed frustration that his bill has not been able to gain more traction, and appeared to be leaning towards backing the Murkowski resolution.
“Senator Murkowski and I have been working to find a way to suspend EPA climate regulations because we believe that Congress – not an unelected federal agency – should decide these enormous economic issues,” said Rockefeller. “I have a bill that mandates a two year suspension at EPA. ...I think my approach is more effective and has a better chance of becoming law,” he said.
However, he added that “the bottom line is – we cannot wait any longer to send the message that relying on EPA is the wrong way to go. The fate of our entire economy, our manufacturing industries and our workers should not be in the hands of EPA.”
New Senate Climate Proposal Unveiled; Reid Talks Strategy
Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) on May 12 unveiled their version of climate legislation, the “American Power Act.”
The two senators went forward without the support of Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the sole Republican who had previously endorsed the effort.
Graham most recently declared passage of climate change legislation “impossible” this year given the Gulf oil spill and his stated reservations about the commitment from the Democratic leadership and the Obama Administration to move the bill. “There are not nearly 60 votes [for passage] today, and I do not see them materializing until we deal with the uncertainty of the immigration debate and the consequences of the oil spill,” Graham said this month.
The Kerry-Lieberman bill will, according to the summary, calls for a 17 percent cut in emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) below the 2005 level by 2020 and an 80 percent reduction by 2050. Emissions limits would apply differently and, according to varying time tables for various industry sectors, starting with power plants in 2013.
If Sens. Kerry and Lieberman are unable to get 60 votes for their climate change bill the Senate will likely act on a smaller energy bill instead, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said this month. Reid was referring to S. 1462, which was approved a year ago by the Energy and Natural Resources Committee with the support of several Republicans.
Sen. Rockefeller Outlines Goals for New Mine Safety Legislation
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) on May 14 unveiled a broad outline of mine safety improvements he will seek to make via new legislation being crafted in response to last month’s accident at the Upper big Branch in West Virginia.
“The tragedy at Upper Big Branch mine was felt by our entire country, and we are still in pain,” said Rockefeller. “Every worker deserves a safe workplace – and it is the job of elected representatives to make sure that all voices are heard and laws are improved.”
Rockefeller’s office, in a press release, said he is working on “new legislative approaches” on workplace safety that include:
- Additional workplace safety enforcement and accountability standards through the Mine Safety and Health Administration and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
- Streamlining Pattern of Violation rules and regulations so that repeat offenders are subject to additional oversight and enforcement.
- Reducing the appeals backlog at the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission in order to prevent companies from avoiding responsibility by making appeals.
- Improved whistleblower protections to empower miners and all workers to report dangerous conditions.
- Increased fines and penalties for companies that routinely violate safety laws and regulations.
More information is available at: Rockefeller Mine Safety Outline.
Bipartisan Group of 23 U.S. House Members Urge EPA to
Drop Stringent New Surface Mining Permit Rules
Kentucky Congressman Hal Rogers (R) spearheaded a recent bipartisan effort with 22 other U.S. House members to urge the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to withdraw recently-implemented rules regarding Appalachian surface mining that have caused significant barriers and delays in issuing job-creating coal mining permits throughout the region.
In a May 11 letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, Rogers and his colleagues requested that EPA instead process pending applications under existing rules while seeking comment from the public on the proposed changes.
“With the EPA’s new rules on surface mining, the Obama Administration has unveiled the latest tactic in its war against Appalachian coal,” said Rogers in a May 11 press statement. “In these challenging economic times, we cannot afford to put 80,000 jobs on the line because the EPA is undertaking a one-sided power-grab, overriding the states, and changing the rules with no warning and with no good reason,” he said.
A copy of the letter is available at: Letter to EPA.